Quantcast

interviews Archive

An Interview with Celeste Ng, Author of Everything I Never Told You

Celeste Ng is the author of the novel Everything I Never Told You, which was a New York Times bestseller, a New York Times Notable Book of 2014, Amazon’s #1 Best Book of 2014, and named a best book of the year by over a dozen publications. Everything I Never Told You was also the winner of the Asian/Pacific American Award for Literature and the ALA’s Alex Award, and was a finalist for numerous awards, including the Ohioana Award, the John Creasey (New Blood) Dagger Award, the VCU Cabell First Novelist Award and the Massachusetts Book Award.

Celeste grew up in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Shaker Heights, Ohio, in a family of scientists. She attended Harvard University and earned an MFA from the University of Michigan, where she won the Hopwood Award. Her fiction and essays have appeared in One Story, TriQuarterly, Bellevue Literary Review, the Kenyon Review Online, and elsewhere, and she is a recipient of the Pushcart Prize. Celeste and I first connected on Twitter after I read her book, and she graciously agreed to chat with me about the novel, her writing routine, being part of and writing about interracial families, how to address issues of race and representation without being pigeonholed, writing outside one’s own culture, what she’s working on now, and much more!

Nicole Chung: Celeste, I have told you this so many times it must be getting old by now, but I absolutely loved your novel. My husband bought it for me, and then I bought it for half a dozen of my friends and relatives, and every single one of them sang its praises. My sister particularly enjoyed it; her exact words were: “Thank you. And damn you, too. By the end I was crying and slightly traumatized, but I loved it.”

How did the idea for this novel come to you? Was it difficult working on such a tragic story, and why did you decide to focus on such tough issues — misunderstanding and racism and unfulfilled dreams and the grief of losing a child?

Celeste Ng: Thank you! Both for the kind words and for sharing. The novel emerged, as most of my work does, when several seemingly unrelated things collided in my mind and I had to try and figure out why my mind was connecting them. My husband happened to tell me a story about his school days: when he was about 8, he was at a friend’s house when the friend pushed his own little sister into a pond in the backyard. She was pulled out immediately by her parents, but I kept thinking, what if they hadn’t been there? What was the relationship between this brother and sister like before he pushed her — and what was it like after?

...Read More

The Convert Series: Aadita Chaudhury

Previously: Kima Jones.

Can you tell me a little bit about your religious background growing up? Did your parents talk much about their own faith, or take you to any religious services? When do you first remember being aware of the concept of God, and what did you think of it?

My family is from the West Bengal state in India. My parents’ religious background, strictly speaking is Hinduism, but that does not quite do it justice or paint a comprehensive picture. Firstly, not only is Hinduism a diverse range of beliefs and practices, I want to stress that my family was a multifaith household with a background of Hinduism. Let me explain further. My maternal grandparents, and as such, were/are devotees of Ramakrishna Paramhansa, who introduced a very interfaith approach to the idea of God even though he himself was an ordained priest at a Hindu temple of Kali. He practiced rituals and forms of prayer of different faith traditions without discrimination, and even abandoned Hindu iconography when especially immersed in some of these experiences. I think more than anything, his contribution to interfaith dialogue came at vulnerable time in India’s religious politics. The British Raj was gaining a stronghold in India, and Indians were experiencing major shifts and challenges to their religious identities like never before. What Ramakrishna did was establish the notion among Indians, and especially Bengalis of the time that all religious and spiritual paths lead to one God, and that whatever form of worship and religion one may inherit and practice is valid. The Ramakrishna order is still active in India and around the world, and they celebrate festivities from other religions, too, such as Christmas, Easter, Eid, Vesakh and many others.

My paternal grandmother, on the other hand, was an atheist widow, which people still find hard to believe. She lived till the age of 105 and never cared for God or religion.

...Read More

The Convert Series: Kima Jones

I like talking with people who have changed religions. Here is one of them. 

Kima Jones is a poet and a book publicist in LA that I met through Roxane Gay at a reading about a year ago. She always wears the most incredible lipstick, and her writing gives me the shivers. I knew she’d become a Muslim as a young woman, and I’d also been giving a lot of thought to the process of religious conversion lately, so the idea of asking her to kick off the Convert Series seemed to follow naturally.

What was your religious background before your conversion? How old were you when you first started thinking about Islam?

I have been a God fearing person all of my life and cannot remember a time when God was not only a part of my life but the fiber of my home. In the bedroom where I slept as a child lived my grandfather’s ashes and the bible next to them, I’m guessing, as a way to watch over my brother and I. There were also the children’s bibles engraved in silver with each of our names when we were baptized and handed to us with care and concern and the expectation that we master the 23rd Psalm with haste and conviction.

...Read More

The Legacy of Oz: A Chat with Tom Fontana (and a Special Guest)

I got obsessed with Oz a few a months ago, when I rewatched the entire show as I was unpacking the house. If you don’t know it—I pity you—Oz, produced by Tom Fontana and Barry Levinson, is the fictional depiction of a prison and its inmates. It got decent reviews, but many critics were put off by the violence. “I am starting to think that some of the violence is excessive,” wrote the Baltimore Sun‘s David Zurawik. “[A]re its sociological themes anything more than window dressing for lurid prison scenes?” asked Caryn James for the New York Times. “The show is as dehumanizing as the prison system it attacks,” said USA Today‘s Dinitia Smith.

Seeing Oz 12 years after it went off the air, however, I was struck by two things. First, how unexaggerated it seems now — it’s brutal and violent, sure, but no more so than an actual supermax. But also, how remarkable it was that one of the main characters is a strong, proud Muslim man, who is unapologetically faithful and is, for the most part, not mocked for it.

After a little prodding, Tom Fontana, who also wrote and produced Homicide: Life on the Streets, invited me to his Manhattan office to talk about Oz and its legacy.

ELON GREEN: I went back and watched the show again, and it was a strange experience. Some it really seemed like a documentary. Particularly the stuff with the Aryan Brotherhood. I just read David Grann’s New Yorker story on them, which was published years after the show began. Everything just seemed way ahead of its time.

TOM FONTANA: Well, I did a couple of years of research before I started really figuring out what the show was. I went to a lot of prisons—maximum security, medium security—and what I began to see was the populations, and how segregated they were. It really was, in a way, reporting. Because all I did was form the characters, not out of any individual that I met, but out of this sort of, oh, this the world, not only in small, but in extremis. It is the world that we live in, but literally all the walls are torn down. These people have to exist with each other, you know, or die in the trying.

...Read More

“I wanted to figure out why we’re so scared of feelings”: An Interview with Tavi Gevinson

Trailing clouds of glitter from a surprise Broadway triumph in Kenneth Lonergan’s serio-comedy This Is Our YouthRookie magazine founder Tavi Gevinson has expanded her extensive resume to include publishing maven. In addition to compiling the fourth Rookie Yearbook, due out this fall, Gevinson just made her debut as a literary editor. In the July/August issue of Poetry, the 103-year-old magazine that introduced American readers to the likes of Ezra Pound, Langston Hughes, and Edna St. Vincent Millay, Gevinson curated and edited more than 50 pages of poems, prose and art, including a self-deprecating, funny, charming essay she wrote about her own evolution as a writer and a reader. She celebrates the kind of sincerity adults are taught to reject; her selections are optimistic, unironic, and downright joyful.

Gevinson and I talked on the phone about poetry, feelings, moving to New York, and her ever-evolving personal aesthetic—she is, after all, still 19.

Eugenia Williamson: In the essay you wrote in Poetry, you talk about the embarrassment you felt about liking Sylvia Plath when you were a young teenager and other ways poetry conjures embarrassment. Tell me more!

Tavi Gevinson: I wouldn’t be comfortable writing poetry myself. I wrote about the shame or stigma I felt around it, and [I wasn’t talking about] the challenge of great poets that you study in English class. Where I went to school, there was a spoken word program, and it was a requirement every year. The teacher who ran the program would come in to your class and run a week-long workshop. I was just too embarrassed to share this stuff with my classmates. I didn’t want to expose [myself] trying to be deep or any of that. I just blew it off a lot of the time. The one time I really tried, I couldn’t get through it without laughing at myself.

Now I feel like it’s really silly to be afraid of those things, and I should have embraced something I’m good at, which is speaking candidly about how I feel. It’s kind of funny—that’s something that maybe you naturally have as a kid or is somewhat innate to childhood, the way kids are brutally honest. Somewhere along the line, you’re like, “Oh wait, life is a competition,” and everything is a reality show; everything is an episode of “The Apprentice.” You learn about parts of the world where the currency is how much you can withhold. But eventually, you learn that if you actually communicate with people then you’ll have happier relationships. [With this essay], I wanted to figure out why we’re so scared of feelings.

...Read More

An Interview with Sarah Jeong, Author of The Internet of Garbage

In her new book, The Internet of Garbage, Sarah Jeong states that “the Internet is, and always has been, mostly garbage.” She talked with The Toast about topics discussed in her book, including online harassment, doxing, spam, free speech, and the challenges of moderating content platforms and social media networks. You can buy Sarah’s book on iTunes or Amazon.

The Toast: If the Internet has always been mostly garbage, why did you write this book now? Do you think we’re better positioned in terms of either will or technology to take more of the garbage out?

Sarah Jeong: The book positions online harassment as part of a larger category of long-extant problems, but when it comes down to it, it’s still a book about online harassment. One of the things I wanted to do with the book was to hammer in how online harassment has been around forever — but I don’t think there would have been an audience for the book until fairly recently. There’s a lot more mainstream awareness of harassment and online misogyny in particular.

Why do you think that is? More media coverage, more survivors of online harassment speaking out?

100% media coverage. Part of that has to do with journalists being aggressively harassed — the journalists then turn around and use their platforms to show the world what is happening to them.

But that’s not the whole story. The Internet now includes a much broader swath of the entire population, which means that the old trite victim-blaming along the lines of “it’s just the Internet” doesn’t work so well. We now recognize the Internet as just another arena for our day-to-day lives, a place that’s no less real than the offline world. The Internet’s ubiquity also means that large-scale incidents of harassment become very large-scale, sucking in celebrities, journalists, even entire media organizations.

In the book, you mention some of the issues with media coverage of harassment — from reports not being clear about the definition of “doxing” to the focus on white cis women who’ve been harassed to the tendency to make harassment seem smaller or less threatening, less real-world, than it really is. Now that we are talking about it more, how can we ensure better, more accurate coverage of this issue? (Apart from sending a copy of your book to every single member of the media!)

The most important thing to address is how people of color — particularly black women — are either erased or villainized when we talk about online harassment. I would love to see a book about online harassment that centers on people of color. I wish my book could have done that, but unfortunately, there just aren’t a lot of studies on, for example, how race exacerbates harassment. There aren’t a lot of media accounts, either. When black women get harassed, either their stories never appear in the media, or their stories get retold, blaming the black woman for the ensuing harassment. See, for example, Jon Ronson’s shameful treatment of Adria Richards.

This isn’t just an issue of equitable treatment in the media. It actually has serious policy ramifications. Some of the most prominent funded anti-harassment activism centers on carceral remedies — that is, resorting to police, prisons, and the criminal justice system. If you’re a person of color, trans, and/or a sex worker, you may be less willing to go to the police.

A related problem is how the problem of harassment is cast as “a torrent of mean words.” And yes, a torrent of mean words really sucks to experience, and user interfaces should be designed to mitigate that, but that’s just froth on top of things like having your address published, your social security number published, your children threatened, your accounts hacked, strange packages arriving your door, strangers following you around your city. One reason why the media focuses on unruly speech over, say, doxing or stalking or swatting, is that mean tweets are out there in the open for everyone to see. No need to do any actual reporting. But this tendency is very harmful. It treats targets like they are fearful and upset because of “mere words.” Targets of sustained harassment aren’t thin-skinned, they’re often being subjected to campaigns aimed at making them afraid.

...Read More

An Interview with Alexander Chee

I’ve loved Alexander Chee’s writing for some time, from the powerful essays that served as my introduction to his work to his debut novel, Edinburgh. Chee won a Whiting Award for Edinburgh, and is a recipient of the NEA fellowship in fiction and residencies from the MacDowell Colony, Ledig House, and Civitella Ranieri. His writing has appeared in The New York Times Book Review, Tin House, Slate, and on NPR. The Toast asked Alexander to talk with us about writing, teaching, changes in publishing, his recent “Future Queer” cover story for The New Republic, and his forthcoming second novel, The Queen of the Night (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Feb. 2016).

The Toast: New York is home for you, but you grew up in Korea, Hawaii, Guam, and Maine, and in some of your essays you’ve mentioned moving a lot as an adult, too. Can you talk a little bit about growing up in so many different places? How has that, and moving around so much, influenced your writing?  

Alexander Chee: I suspect I don’t have quite the same relationship to place.

I remember when we moved to Maine and I realized that we wouldn’t keep moving — in a way, staying in place was harder. And the kids I met, this was age 6 — they couldn’t imagine or even pronounce “Guam”. It felt like meeting evangelical Christians and knowing there are other gods.

So for a long time after that, I felt as if my real home was someplace I had yet to find. Part of that was about being biracial in that historical moment — my parents’ marriage was illegal just a few years before they married. People would say, for decades, “Someday everyone will look like you,” which made me feel as if the place I belonged was the future, not the present — and which also made it feel as if it would never arrive. It was like being born into exile, an immigrant at birth from a country that didn’t exist yet — a country I’d have to build or, maybe, find.

A therapist once accurately described me as someone with many identities I keep in reserve for those who can understand them — and that I needed to experience myself as whole, not as a series of aliases created in order to have connections to others. I suspect that may be why I write fiction. That’s something I do explore in my new novel — a feeling of being permanently outside, always pretending to belong to the landscape, of changing one’s identity regularly and starting over, again and again. I gave that to Lilliet, my narrator in The Queen of the Night, though I didn’t realize it until near the end of writing it.

After your recent Future Queer cover story for TNR, you hosted a #FutureQueer conversation @tnr. What has most surprised or stuck with you from that discussion and the overall response to your story?  

I was and am still very moved by the very personal responses I’ve received. Stories of the emotional cost. A friend whose godmother wanted her whole life to marry her partner and now at 93, her partner’s Alzheimer’s would make it an empty gesture, or a one-sided one.

There was a certain amount of people who believed I was saying whatever they needed me to say — that I was for or against marriage, for or against assimilation, despite my trying to describe my very real ambivalence and my fears about the future. But mostly I think that what I was trying to say was heard.

In the Twitter chat what was immediately apparent, though, was the way the problems in America are the problems in the LGBTQI community — in our case, an exhaustion with looking at two white men in suits carrying bouquets and not seeing any other faces or getting the stories of other lives. Behind the word “intersectionality” is so much potential strength — and it’s exhausting to see that unmet still as much as it is.

...Read More

Channing Tatum Has Heard Of Roxane Gay And By Extension Is Now An Employee Of The Toast

I think Nicole already put this in one of her link roundups, but frankly I’m not done being excited about this yet.

What’s most appealing – and perhaps surprising – about the sequel to the 2012 hit is the overriding sense of inclusiveness and acceptance. The film’s already been called ‘body positive‘ and ‘sex positive‘, praised for its focus on diversity and female desire. For what’s essentially a buddy road film centred on a bunch of dudes – what Quentin Tarantino might call “a hangout movie” – it still manages to be a film for those Hollywood generally tends to ignore, especially women.

THIS FELT VERY TRUE TO ME, I can confirm that seeing this with a massive group of women was one of the most life-affirming and joy-filled experiences I’ve had in recent memory. Also, who would have guessed that hands-down the sexiest scene in a movie about dudes getting tits-out would be a muted greeting between two fully-dressed women? (JADA PINKETT SMITH, IF YOU EVER ESCAPE SCIENTOLOGY I AM HERE FOR YOU.)

...Read More