It Is Impossible For Me To Determine Whether Or Not You Have Been Offended
I would like to take this opportunity to apologize if you were offended by my recent behavior. Sadly, there is no way to determine whether you have in fact been offended at this time, as the science just isn’t there yet. We may never know if you were offended or not — in fact, can it truly be said that we can ever know anything? What is truth, and how can we, limited and finite beings that we are, ever make legitimate claims upon it? Who is to say that what we perceive as “the real world” is not in fact an elaborate delusion? Can we not just as easily say that my latest remarks are the work of some unknowable force governing us as we sit in a sea of brain-vats as they were words I chose to say with my actual mouth? The answer, of course, is that there is no answer; we dare not philosophize further.
If I could somehow be certain that you were offended, of course, then I would be the very first person to apologize to you. I am the last person on this planet who would put off a necessary apology in order to save face or avoid self-recrimination, as you well know (at least to whatever degree you can be said to know anything). Were I convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that offense was given, an apology would certainly be forthcoming.
Yet such is my commitment to truth and honesty — insofar as “truth” and “honesty” can be said to exist, that is — that I could not possibly in good conscience deliver an unconditional apology and risk making restitution where no offense had been given.
At this very moment, teams of experienced researchers are hard at work, attempting to determine whether of not you have been offended by me, or possibly someone else. Should they arrive at a successful conclusion, you will undoubtedly be notified immediately about their findings. Whether or not you were offended, who you were offended by, the degree to which you were offended, whether or not an apology would ameliorate said offense or whether everyone should just let bygones be bygones, whether that apology would best be delivered by me or if you would prefer it to come from some third party who may have been the ones really at fault here: all of these questions are being carefully investigated by experts in their field. I ask for your patience during this trying time.
Please be assured that determining whether or not you have been offended is of the utmost importance to me, and I shall not rest until I have determined if you were (figuratively speaking, of course; I have every intention of getting a full eight hours’ tonight). How sorry I would be, if I were sure that you had been offended by the behavior and actions and also words that have transpired of late. But is it better to give an apology where none is needed, or to refrain from taking positive action in the lack of justifiable belief? Surely we must refrain from taking unnecessary action, lest we descend into anarchy and chaos.
What is an apology, anyway, when you really get down to it?
We live in a world filled with uncertainty and doubt; it is entirely possible that, despite our best efforts, we will not be able to determine whether or not you have been offended, in which case I trust you will understand that an apology will not be forthcoming from me. This sort of thing is out of my hands; I am only trying to be sure before doing anything rash. You understand.
[Image via Wikimedia Commons]
Tags: apologies, offense, things we cannot possibly know
Related Posts


















Internet debates have forever changed.
Mallory, you are the best. That is all.
My dissertation was literally on the subject of apologies and I cannot like this enough. I retweeted so hard I broke my mouse.
Daniel Mallory Ortberg for president.
Ortberg 2016.
Ortberg/Airlock 2016
I think I do a good job of speaking so that I don't offend entire groups of people, but when it comes to individuals, it is a lost cause.
hahahah too real, man
I can tell from your attitude that you are at the very least miffed. Unfortunately, due to my own personal and arcane standards, the unhappiness you demonstrate is not sufficient to warrant sincere self-reflection on my part. I think probably no one regrets this more than I. Therefore, I recommend that you consider the possibility that your upset state is a result of your own thin skin rather than any fault of mine, and furthermore that your thin skin keeps you from approaching the matter as rationally as I do.
I just this very morning commented on a Language Log post that notpologizing is a fine art, and the same can be said of satire. This? This is a veritable Sistine Chapel of a post. *standing ovation*
Oh, Mallory. Your glorious satire is a soothing balm to my angry soul.
I shall print this off, wrap it round a brick of varying density depending on the infraction, and use it to smack fauxpologisers in the face.
I approve of this plan with all my icy heart.
I'll have forgotten this by the time we have the next open thread, but I had a Toast dream last night about an article Mallory wrote about a quiet mousy girl who fell for a James Dean (not Deen) style bad boy called Treble. They were separated by the vagaries of life and found each other again years later, and it included the line 'but who could really love a little maniac like this'. I can't remember which of them was the little maniac though. I fear my subconscious a bit.
I cannot determine whether or not my thread-derailing has offended you.
'They were separated by the vagaries of life…'
Shame about that, else she'd have had Treble without a pause…
I think this is wonderful, but what do I know? What do any of us know?
My dissertation was literally on the subject of apologies and I cannot like this enough. I retweeted so hard I broke my mouse.