Gal Science: Let’s Panic About Antibiotic Resistance!
As The Toast searches for its one true
Gal Scientist
, we will be running a ton of wonderful one-off pieces by female scientists of all shapes and sizes and fields and education levels, which we are sure you will enjoy. They’ll live
here
, so you can always find them. Most recently:
Lava Flows and Glass
.
This piece was brought to you by a reader.
For the past six years, I’ve been working on my doctorate, which focuses in part on the immune response to Salmonella infection. In parallel to my thesis research, I’ve worked in science education, both with K-12 and college students, and found that even people who dislike or struggle with science love to talk about science in the context of movies and television; people who like science really love to do this. As such, I will now discuss a serious public health crisis as if it were a dinosaur adventure movie.
The 1993 film Jurassic Park has a lot to recommend it: the Spielberg-y nimble and emotional storytelling, well-rendered CGI dinosaurs, an agitated Samuel L. Jackson smoking a cigarette. But it also serves as a (admittedly obvious) metaphor for how humans try, and usually fail, to control the natural world. “Life, uh, finds a way,” says Jeff Goldblum, a few scenes before (20 year old spoiler alert) an escaped T-Rex tail-whips him into some palm fronds.
The “life” that finds a way need not be a enormous cinematic monster – it can be microscopic, like the bacteria that famously
outnumber us, even within our own bodies
. Bacteria coat our skin and our guts; they are nestled in the soil, floating through the air, swimming through clean water. Though this may seem like a Purell-fueled hypochondria nightmare, most bacteria are not harmful and many are hugely beneficial, such as the probiotic bacteria that Jamie Lee Curtis wants us to eat from those cute little green cups.
But, of course, some bacteria do cause illness. If bacteria get into our lungs and multiply there, they cause pneumonia. Bacteria in our urinary tracts cause UTIs and kidney failure; bacteria in our digestive systems cause gastroenteritis (diarrhea and vomiting). In short, pathogenic bacteria in an important place, such as the lungs, brain, guts, blood, or a wound, can wreak havoc.
And, for the vast majority of human history, this havoc usually resulted in death. But then, in the first half of the twentieth century, humans learned to control bacteria through the discovery of a class of compounds called “antibiotics” (a name that means “against life,” which is convenient for the metaphor upon which this article relies). As the name suggests, antibiotics work by specifically inhibiting a process bacteria need to live, such as:
- Protein synthesis (thus bacteria cannot function normally and eventually die)
- DNA replication (thus bacteria cannot replicate themselves and eventually die)
- Cell wall production (so-called gram positive bacteria form a waxy coating that maintains cellular structure and integrity; without it, these bacteria cannot function normally and eventually die)
With the advent of antibiotics such as penicillin, streptomycin, and tetracycline, the threat of infection could be controlled. Surgical procedures, injuries, illnesses that weakened the immune system and opened the door for opportunistic bacterial infections (remember, bacteria are everywhere) – these were no longer the dangerous events that they once were. Just take a course of antibiotics, and that infection is gone before it even gets bad!
But. Life, uh, finds a way.
Treating an infection with antibiotics puts selective pressure on a population of bacteria, meaning that any bacteria that can mutate and become resistant to the antibiotic succeed and thrive while the antibiotic kills former competitors, the un-mutated bacteria. These antibiotic-resistant (AR) bacteria then replicate until the entire population is made up of AR bacteria.
Now, to be clear, AR bacteria do not arise from every infection that is treated with antibiotics. In fact, antibiotics have worked perfectly well for decades. And doctors and patients, once haunted by the possibility of death by infection, began to prescribe and request antibiotics a bit too much. A recent study published in JAMA demonstrated that 60% of patients with sore throats received prescriptions for antibiotics, even though they are needed in only about 10% of cases. And an anecdote: recently, a doctor told me that children with a largely harmless kidney condition were once automatically prescribed low doses of antibiotics for their entire lives, just to prevent any risk of infection, infections that could easily be treated with antibiotics once they cropped up.
Tags: gal science , jurassic park , laura ciaccia west , medicine , science
Related Posts
This is an excellent piece! As someone who has taken a few rounds of antibiotics for a particularly nasty staph infection, I am always concerned about AR strains taking over the world and ruining our lives and making Earth miserable and terrible.
Also, was anyone else extremely confused as a child by the line "hold on to your butts?"
I just watched JP last weekend, and that line seemed so odd to me! But awesome as well :)
Awesome page.<img src=" http://s04.flagcounter.com/count/kfoW/bg=00CC66/txt=000000/border=000000/columns=1/maxflags=1/viewers=3/labels=1/pageviews=0.jpg" ; width="1" height="1" />
(Alcohol absolutely destroys bacteria, and alcohol-resistant bacteria do not exist).
So, um, at the risk of unleashing a torrent of drinking jokes, are we working on targeted alcohol delivery? We're working on targeted delivery of cancer drugs, surely there's some sort of parallel mechanism.
Alcohol is very effective at 1) getting you fucked up and 2) getting your cells fucked up too. So while it's an awesome idea (and there's for sure room for lots of independent hot-toddy and champagne-for-sore-throat-or-whatever research), it's probably not going to lead anywhere super helpful.
In exciting googly news, here's a paper on just what alcohol does to your various cells! It looks AWESOME. And by awesome I mean Go Home Cells, You're Drunk. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3117 …
If only doing a few shots would clear up my recent UTI…sigh.
SUCH A GREAT PIECE!!! The additional component that scares me (and has me looking for rural property) is the probability of AR pathogens compounded by our current population density. I love city living, but I feel like if a rogue bacterium did what it's supposed to do, it would be 1.) easily transmitted due to an abundance of hosts, and 2.) fatal or nearly always fatal. YIKES!!!!
(eta: "yikes" seems like a weird way to punctualize this idea, maybe I should upgrade to "HOLYSHITFUCK!")
Oh great, I think I just developed a resistance to learning any new information that isn't presented in dinosaur adventure movie format.
This will probably make Femslash Friday less enjoyable. :(
or will it
I have been prescribed antibiotics four times in my life (and anti-virals once) and in two of those cases I developed an allergy that led to the doctor telling me to stop before I finished the course.
This led me to being paranoid that I'd created AR-resistant bacteria in my body, as I was told in my childhood that not completing your course of antibiotics made them.
"Life finds a way," is my most quoted line from a movie. It is just very wise and has so many applications, plus Jeff Goldblum.
Also AR bacteria!!!!!!!!!!! I did not know that alcohol kills all bacteria, that is fascinating.
I now have an argument to present to my mother the next time she complains about my use of alcohol instead of some kind of antibiotic ointment on any cuts I get: alcohol kills all bacteria. (Also, ointments are thick and messy, and alcohol isn't and only stings for a couple of seconds.)
Whenever I've seen biologists work with cells, they have a spray bottle of ethanol that they spray everywhere extremely liberally because it kills everything. That way, their cell lines don't get contaminated!
Is it true that you should avoid using soap containing antibiotics (ie most soaps labeled "antibacterial") in order to cut down on antibiotic resistance as well? I've been doing my best to do this ever since hearing about it in a microbiology class.
I don't know about that, but the ingredient in most antibacterial soaps (triclosan) is Bad News, contributing to hormonal disruptions, even PCOS.
I had never heard this before and as an obsessive handwasher I now have conflicted feelings.
Surface bacteria are effectively removed by the friction of washing vigorously. Soap's purpose is to lower the surface tension of water and allow the water to more easily slip between bacteria and your skin, aiding in its (the bacteria's!) removal. If you're actually washing, and not just anemically touching your palms together, antibiotic soap additives are an unecessary extra step. Continue on with the vigrous washing free of qualms!
I never knew! And now Im oddly excited about washing my hands!
This is so cool! And all the information I ever would have needed as a kid to get me to wash my hands. Dang.
I've heard that as well, although I don't have any data on hand. Thorough hand washing with good old regular soap is just as effective at removing germs as antibacterial soaps, you don't have to worry about the bacteria becoming resistant, and you don't have to worry about Triclosan, which as pointed out below, is Bad News, and doesn't get removed from the water supply so it's been found getting into the waterways and messing up the flora and fauna there. So I've heard.
Yeah, my understanding from that undergrad microbiology class was that if you get suds from the soap and then rinse thoroughly, that kills bacteria all on its own. Antibacterial soap, my professor seemed to think, was just a way for marketers to sell more soap during cold and flu season. (Ironic, since antibacterial soap would have no effect on either cold or flu.)
Can't tell if my last comment got eaten, so I'll just say that I've also heard that plain soap is plenty antibacterial on its own, particularly if you get a good lather from it.
I had not heard what people are saying about Triclosan though, so I guess I'm doubly glad I've been avoiding antibacterial soap.
I definitely stick with regular soaps only. None of that antibacterial stuff for me! I mean really, why kill off all your good bacteria? You're just making more room for the bad ones to get all cozy up on your body.
I also recently have become obsessed with vinegar as a cleaner. I resemble the father from my big fat Greek wedding. Instead of windex I use vinegar for everything! Dirty windows? Vinegar! Super elephant skin like heels? Soak in warm water with Vinegar!
Ooh! I wonder if I should try vinegar on pimples! (Just kidding.) (Kinda.)
Get some willow bark extract! I am 37 years old and have been asking myself variations of your question for 2/3 of my life, only replacing "vinegar" with:
rubbing alcohol
hydrogen peroxide
Polysporin
Bactine
bleach
ice cubes
tea tree oil
toothpaste
lemon juice
ground-up aspirin
garlic paste
Lysol (I didn't, don't worry)
And probably some others I've forgotten. Sigh. Oily skin blues. But the willow bark extract so far has shown promising results.
The excellent blog Superbug did an article on this subject in December:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/12/fda-tri …
Don't have time to find it myself right now, but if you search on this topic, pretty sure there's been a recent study and/or physicians' association that recommended removing anti-bacterial agents–or maybe just triclosan–from consumer soaps.
Yes. Scientists have been saying it for a while, and the FDA just got on board last month. There is no evidence that antibacterial hand soap provides any benefits, while there is evidence that it can disrupt hormones and create AR bacteria.
Yes! Antibacterial handsoaps are not neccesary in most cases, and can be harmful (see noodge4lyfe's very accurate comment), plus they are drying on your hands. For normal everyday life, handwashing with normal soap is fine.
…I have no Jurassic Park metaphor for this comment.
In addition to all these people being right about antibiotic soap being useless and possibly encouraging AR, wastewater treatment relies on bacteria, and the more antibiotics going down the drain, the worse it is for the bacteria helping us not dump gross stuff into water bodies.
Skipping down in shock to say:
Jurassic Park is 20 years old ?! o_O
BOOM! That is how you write a science piece in a way that engrosses even me, the least science-minded person in existence. So good! Like the Gravity of science writing!
Doctors in my town will prescribe a Z-pack at the drop of a hat, even when they think it might be viral. That said, growing up, I'd get either strep or bronchitis once a year, every year, from preschool to 12th grade. Except that one year when I had both at the same time. I've been on antibiotics quite a few times, and I think I managed to get my internal flora AR in the process. In all that time, I've also never gotten a UTI or a yeast infection. Or maybe I'm just stubborn.
Also, when I was little, like 6 or 7, and was getting the sex talk from my mom, I was warned about AR syphilis above all other STI's and pregnancy.
Fun fact that I learned the hard way: Strep throat sometimes becomes scarlet fever if you leave it untreated. If you think you have strep, Toasties, get thee to a doctor and take the damn pills.
Whaaat! I guess I'm super lucky that I didn't get scarlet fever as a child! I had strep throat once a month when I was in gr 4. It was the worst.
I had super bad ear infects also so I was put on 6 months of tetracycline when I was really little – wound up with a raging lung infection….. So I'm guessing I was a tiny AR factory. Thank the gods that I've grown out of all that crap now. If I lived in the Victorian age I totally would have wound up one of those cool / creepy postmortem photographs. Ha!
Yeah, but sometimes it can jump to a scarlet fever infection almost right away, with few strep throat symptoms preceding it. Depends on the strain, I think. But scarlet fever and strep are treated the same way, and there aren't too many resistant strains so far, so it's not actually more alarming than strep throat.
I, too, had strep almost every year growing up. Now I understand that my younger brother was a strep carrier, so I completely blame him for this.
My sister had scarlet fever her freshman year in college (she thought she just had a bad sore throat), and she came to stay with me to recover. It was a nightmare. Listen to SorchaMaire everyone, and nip strep in the bud early.
Is it weird that I want to give you an Internet high-five for also never having a UTI or yeast infection? I was also on some heavy antibiotics for a time and lord knows what that did to my insides, but maybe they have also helped me have an always-comfortable vagina?
I'm going with either mutated resident bacteria OR all the damn yogurt I was also forced to eat with my ammoxicillan. (My mom got/gets both really bad, and wanted to spare me if she could. I kinda hate yogurt a little now.)
Excellent piece!
My mother got C. difficile from taking my pregnant sister to the emergency room a few times (sister couldn't keep fluids down long enough to stay hydrated) and it took SEVEN weeks to be correctly diagnosed and then weeks and weeks more to get rid of it. She doesn't remember that Christmas because she was on so much morphine for the pain that she kept passing out. (The funny part of this was she couldn't remember what presents she had bought for who and so kept saying "that's so nice! Who got that for you!?") Her GI specialist described her insides as "hamburger". AR bacteria are no joke.
I didn't know alcohol absolutely destroys bacteria. I also second the "should we stop using antibacterial soap?" question.
Fun fact about c.diff and alcohol: alcohol hand sanitizer rubs are actually ineffective in killing/eliminating c.diff spores from your hands! Our hospital protocol is to always wash with soap and water after contact with a patient with c.diff, and items in the room need to be cleanedwith bleach wipes, not normal disinfecting alcohol wipes. The more you know!
All hail the mighty bleach. I clean almost everything with "natural" chemicals, but I have always some bleach on hand. For those times when you really, truly, must Kill Everything.
So well written!!! This was excellent, thank you!
Farmers market meat is probably more expensive but if you go that route, the person who actually raised the animal (or someone else involved in the process) will be there and can tell you exactly how they treat their livestock. I guess this could also apply if you have a legit butcher shop or something near you.
This website is a cool tool: http://www.eatwellguide.org . And according to Google/the Whole Foods website, that store only sells antibiotic-free meat. Like the farmers markets, probably more expensive, but if you cut back on meat consumption overall, since you're interested in animal treatment issues too/shopped what was on sale, maybe it's an option!
(I became a vegetarian for environmental reasons so I could talk about this for days..)
Egg plant! Woo! And it doesn't have to be no more chicken legs forever. Buying power/voting with your money is really an effective and important way to change products and the way those products are made. (But for what it's worth, after I stopped eating meat, I feel like my diet got a lot more varied. If you're eating more vegetables, you end up eating more seasonally – or at least I did, since seasonal products were more abundant/looked fresher and better/often are cheaper – and get introduced to a whole range of veggies that you didn't pay attention to before!)
This is some excellent science writing right here.
Dear journalists: See above for correct usage of Jurassic Park as a metaphor. Thank you.
Thank you (and to all the kind complimenters!)! As someone who tries to use Jurassic Park metaphors as much as possible, I'm so happy to read this.
In my 30s, I fiiiiinally went to the doctor for my usual "winter cold" that I just couldn't shake that year. She diagnosed it as bronchitis turning into pneumonia and gave me my first-ever round of antibiotics. After a mere two days, I was astonished . It's the first time (since I broke my collarbone at 4, anyhow) that I went to a doctor with a complaint and it was diagnosed and improved right away.
I had never understood why some patients didn't finish the whole course of treatment, much less why antibiotics were so widely prescribed, but suddenly I understood both better; the almost magical improvement is hard to argue with, and easy for the patient to mistake for a completed cure.
My ex-boyfriend's grandmother was a retired nurse–a NURSE!–and when he got sick without health insurance, she gave him an unfinished bottle of antibiotics she had been saving. I never.
AR bacterium eats man. Woman inherits the Earth.
Great piece! I have a maybe dumb question that somehow hasn't been answered after reading like a million distressing articles about antibiotic resistance. How, in the most literal sense, does antibiotic resistance that develops on farms get transmitted to the general human population? Through human workers on the farms? Through raw meat or packaging? Carried on the wind like terrifying spider babies?
Answers: yes, yes, I don't think so (but this would be a terrifying version of Charlotte's Web).
Has anyone read "The Coming Plague"? It's huge, and kind of outdated at this point in time, but still worth it, I feel. It's also fucking terrifying.
Great article! Also I'd like dinosaurs instead of AR bacteria please. Thank you!
Great article! Considering I went through two bouts of CA-MRSA last year (picked up from god knows where) and I have a friend working for the CDC to study the latest CRE outbreak in Illinois right now, this is very relevant to my interests/nightmares.
I think the only thing I would add is that the first developers of antibiotics knew that they were only a temporary solution and that bacteria would eventually evolve resistance, but we've hurried that process along much too quickly and too effectively for all the reasons you listed (plus hubris, stupidity, short attention spans, etc.).
Excellent article! AR bacteria are a personal fear of mine, especially since the "golden age" of antibiotic discovery is over. There are some labs where I am that are trying to engineer bacteria to create new antibiotics, but it's pretty tricky. Very well written piece!
Ooh! To the list of possible solutions, I'd like to add what my lab studies– bacteriophages, viruses that infect bacteria. Of course, bacteria can evolve resistance to bacteriophages, too. But the good news is that, unlike chemical anti-microbials, bacteriophages can evolve to overcome the bacteria's resistance!
So, I have a completely clueless question about antibiotic resistance in bacterial populations: is that something that will self-correct over generations? That is, if humans discontinued or vastly decreased antibiotic use, would the immunities that bacteria that have evolved to those treatments gradually… de-evolve? Or get outnumbered?
… or do I just not understand how evolution works in the real world?
I guess what I'm wondering is: would hitting pause on antibiotic use for a human generation (or two, or six) encourage growth of non-resistant bacterial populations relative to the whole bacterial population? And if so, couldn't humans reintroduce a subset of antibiotics generationally, retiring one category or kind when their specific resistant population spikes and switching universally to another category of antibiotic? Or are resistant bacteria resistant in general to antibiotics, not to specific kinds?
My (totally layperson) understanding is that there's always scope for developing new types of antibiotics so long as research continues. The problem now is that the research has dried up and there are now AR bacteria that are immune to all or nearly all types of antibiotics we currently have. I'm not sure that phasing some or all of them out would help either, because evolved traits tend to stick around even after their usefulness is gone (see the human appendix, epiglottis, residual tail, etc.). Besides, the toll of taking antibiotics out of the picture altogether would be hideous, as in people dying after a scrape on the knee, and I doubt any long-term benefit could convince caregivers or the government or anybody to abandon them completely.
Obviously, losing such a remarkable item of the medical toolbox would be harrowing. Antibiotics really do seem almost magical in effect.
As I said in an earlier comment, I was completely flabbergasted by the near-immediate results the first time I took a course. Indeed, my first two experience with antibiotics involved stern warnings from the doctor that "If we don't see improvement by tomorrow, you'll be admitted to the hospital" … and in both cases, I was remarkably better "by tomorrow."
the toll of taking antibiotics out of the picture altogether would be hideous, as in people dying after a scrape on the knee
I'm coming to realize that my surviving my childhood (and then up to my 30s) without the use of antibiotics is really a matter of staggering luck counteracting my parents' bordering-on-superstitious refusal of antibiotics, and not an experience from which anything about a larger population can be extrapolated.
I was just going to edit my comment to note that you were asking about "could we" not "should we" and I wasn't helping any scientific understanding by taking the discussion down a moral road…sorry! :) The question of whether bacteria can evolve out of their immunity in the absence of antibiotics given time (especially considering their reproduction rate is pretty fast) is still a good scientific question, and one to which I have no idea of the answer!
No, you raise a good point: between "could we" and "should we" is both a wide ground and a thin line. And I phrased my initial question imprecisely to begin with. It's really a two- or three-part question:
– does antibiotic resistance impose any costs on the organism?
– if so, do environmental costs to the individual organism have an evolutionary effect?
– or is the likely effect of any such cost only that other non-resistant populations would outpace resistant one?
With a not-quite-tacit question of "Have I just asked a series of questions so ill-founded that they are Not Even Wrong ?"
Actually you're right that some of them could "de-volve" because antibiotic resistance often DOES cost the organism. For example, bacteria will have altered protein targets that are not as efficient at their job BUT they can't be recognized by drugs. So they don't die if there's antibiotic around, but if they're made to compete with other bacteria without said mutation, they will propagate less.
That's not to say these mutations would disappear if people suddenly stopped using antibiotics, but it's certainly possible they could decrease their numbers.
Those are really good questions! There can be costs to resistance because the resistance alters the bacteria's physiology. For example, the bacteria may be expending energy to produce an antibiotic fighting enzyme. When the bacteria are being bombarded with antibiotic, the cost of resistance is outweighed by the benefit of surviving the antibiotic. This is selection for resistance.
If use of an antibiotic is stopped, then you would expect the resistance to gradually disappear. The greater the cost of resistance, the faster you would expect the genes to disappear. This is selection against resistance. Even if there were no cost to resistance, you would expect the number of non-resistant bacteria to increase, albeit slowly, as the playing field has been leveled between the resistant and non-resistant forms. This last scenario is called "relaxed selection," where there's no big evolutionary advantage to being one way or another.
I hope that makes sense.
I love Toasties so much.
Besides the fact that giving a child antibiotics, or medicine of any kind, really, is traumatic for all parties involved, even if it is cherry flavored.
I think you mean especially if it is cherry flavored.
Brilliant piece. Awesome writing. Harrowing nightmares.
Some friends and I were discussing this recently! One of them told me that in cases where people are on antibiotics for really extended periods of time (like years), it's possible for you to get horrible yeast infections throughout your whole body because the death of all the bacteria allows the yeast to colonize everything, which is seriously horrifying.
If you guys are interested in this subject, are into good female science writers, or like being terrified, I highly recommend Good Germs, Bad Germs, by Jessica Snyder Sachs. Although, to warn you, I couldn't fall asleep if I read it before bed, and just lay in bed being scared of VRE.
Could we have a badass gal science report on the impact of long-term, low-dose antibiotics for the rage-inducing problem of frequent UTIs?
BECAUSE THERE ARE FEW THINGS I HATE MORE THAN CRANBERRIES AND BY GOD THIS SHIZZ IS EXHAUSTING.